Saturday, April 30, 2005

God's All Embracing Love

Wow! What gem I found. Here are some excerpts of excerpts from letters from Christoph Friedrich Blumhardt, a German Lutheran pastor, writing circa 1900 to his son-in-law who was a missionary in China.
As it says in the Forward to the free e-book The Hidden Christ :
“His words lack polish. Blumhardt clearly writes from a passionately moved heart, hastily jotting down thoughts with little regard for the choice of words or the skillful marshalling of ideas. Theologically, too, there are many points over which one could take issue. But Blumhardt never claimed to be a systematic thinker. In fact, many central assertions seem to have no clear inner connection, and even a remarkable duality, especially with problems involving the institutional church and the Church of Christ, Christians and non-Christians, testimony by word and testimony by deed.”
Yet at a time when we struggle to find relevance in a chaotic world, I find his approach refreshing and exciting…

God's All-Embracing Love

Christoph Friedrich Blumhardt
These excerpts are from Blumhardt's letters to his son-in-law, Richard Wilhelm, a missionary in China.

God's love tears down old divisions. No longer religion against religion, Christians against non-Christians, but justice against sin, life against death. His love embraces everyone. Therefore, every person you encounter should be your concern. Do not settle for less. The whole world must see the glory of God. …

God protects the oppressed. He will see to it that they receive his blessing. Today his spirit moves upright hearts everywhere, without asking what kind of a religion they cling to. Our task is to spread the gospel of Christ, not the gospel of Christians. Christ does not want separation. …

The chief thing is to be an apostle of Jesus Christ, not an apostle of the European Christian world. Have patience, and whatever you do, stay clear of forming a party. Your work must embrace the whole, then your integrity will win you everyone's trust.

… The conversion of individuals is only a temporary measure. Individual conversion by itself risks the sin of pharisaism. A single baptized person can so easily flatter himself, thinking he or she is a special person, able to give someone a spiritual kick now and then.

… When we come to a foreign land in the name of Jesus, we should thank God that a law already exists which can find fulfillment. Or do we think we have first to hammer the laws of Moses into people? This would be to stand above God, whose spirit has been at work long before we Christians showed up!

… No one can honor God without honoring what is of God in people.

Conservatism of every stripe hinders and paralyzes everything. The Chinese are bound by this, just as much as Christians who are in the church's clutches. The Chinese are imprisoned by an inordinate veneration of the family and an overemphasis on superstitious customs. All this prevents them from experiencing any real change. In this sense, Confucianism seems to me to be a kind of church, controlling every mood of the soul, inducing anxiety, and hindering genuine progress. You will no doubt encounter great obstacles the more you draw close to people and move beyond superficial acquaintance.

Many missionaries feel this makes them right in wanting to use Christianity to uproot the national character of the Chinese. But they will soon find out where that leads! If a nationalistic spirit is aroused, on either side, then all foreign elements will be swept away, and the Christians themselves will become enemies. Only those who act justly toward the people and represent their interests in the face of oppression will stand the test of Christ's love.

…My hope is that Christ quietly works and comforts, and that a difference of spirit between what you and others are trying to do can be clearly sensed. As you rightly point out, aggressive attempts at missionizing do not spring from the love of God, but from the spirit of business.

During my recent visit to Cairo, where I had to preach at the local mission house, I was made acutely aware of what a distortion it is to play Christianity like a trump card when we relate with Muslims, instead of simply allowing the Savior to speak through us. Islam is not so absolutely closed that the spirit of God is unable to work there. Certainly, these people will never become European Christians - not that they would gain anything by it if they did.

There is something very impressive about the worship of Allah in the Islamic faith. Not only are there few religious forms, but there is a heartfelt devotion to Allah, even in the midst of misfortune and despite a strict moral code. As a religion, Islam has the kind of strength that is able to influence the actions of its followers. It is true that everything in Islam is quite rigid, which obscures the living, human, and personal love of our Father in heaven. Only Jesus, the Son of Man, can reveal this to them. But to the Muslim, European Christians appear immoral and irreligious-and not without some justification.



God's plan is to lift us out of our animal-like existence into the life of the Spirit. A great deal of truth still has to be revealed - from non-Christian peoples as well-to show that from the beginning God has wanted to create something good and true wherever there is an opening far beyond our narrow boundaries.



Only Christ expresses God's nature clearly. Apart from him all our human efforts to change the structure of society will collapse as soon as outer circumstances change. "We must be redeemed from the curse of the law and enter into the freedom of the children of God" (Gal. 3:13). It is the Chinese law, like our high and mighty morality in Europe, which holds the people back. As my father wrote to me when I was young, "Our virtues have become our greatest sin." They hinder the living God from doing something new.

Although great and profound outer changes can occur quite apart from any revelation from God, there is nothing more wonderful than the indwelling Christ. When he is present, streams of living water flow out, bringing life to people. This is something that transcends human goodness. What God directs is never destroyed, even when nations suffer ruin. Only where Christ's love rules are human beings valued for who they are, and everything else - social institutions and customs - takes second place and even become quite unimportant.

The hidden Church of Jesus Christ, out of which something of God's future can come, remains and will never die. The lines of human ideals and Christ's kingdom run parallel. And the mantles of Confucianism and Christianity are in tatters. A new mantle is needed - made of God's pure love and the capacity to receive it.

Excerpted from The Hidden Christ, available FREE in e-book format.

Thursday, April 28, 2005

Joy At Work - Synopsis

Looks like an interesting book. The link below is to a fairly detailed synopsis.

"Dennis W. Bakke's passion is to make work exciting, rewarding, stimulating, and enjoyable. While most business books focus on top executives, Joy at Work is aimed primarily at the working life of the other 90 to 95 percent of people in large organizations. According to Bakke, co-founder and CEO emeritus of the AES Corporation, a worldwide energy company with
40,000 employees and $8.6 billion in revenue by 2002, a better measure of an organization's success than the bottom line is the quality of work life."

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

ARghh! Can't somebody actually engage NT Wright in real debate?

I've been reading a lot of NT Wright and find his take on the NT compelling and encouraging to my faith. Yet his "new perspective on Paul," as I've learned his views are categorized, are sufficiently different from "classic" evangelical teaching, at least on certain topics such as justification, that they've attracted a fair amount of criticism. I'm quite interested to understand some of the basis for this criticism so I can wrestle with it myself.

So I was pleased to find the list of critical articles mentioned in the previous post and immediately began reading the first article, which was supposed to be "a very well crafted, effective response to Wright...
The Attractions of the New Perspective(s) on Paul - Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, Inc

Alas! After an hour of reading (its a long article) I am no closer to my goal. There are perhaps three or four actual places where he "engages" with Wright. The rest is a recapitulation of the NPP ideas surrounded by subtle and not-so-subtle hints that they are seducing promising young evangelical students and laity (always the young ones, mind you, or the "laity", never the mature, evangelical). This is followed by "11 reasons" Wright is so popular (he's a hero for taking on the "Jesus Seminar," he's witty and charming and does a better job supporting his case with exegetical studies.. "don't underestimate him").

Yet when it gets to actually identifying what's wrong, this article at least suffices with assertions primary substantiated by reference to other scholars, who themselves assert such things as "the NPP misreads Luther and Calvin". No where is there the kind of detailed argumentation one finds so attractive in Wright's own writing. He lays out the other side, provides several variations of it and then one-by-one attacks them head on.

Don't get me wrong. I understand how hard it is do what I suggest. I am falling into the same trap in this blog entry (i.e. simply asserting a problem with taking the time and energy to quote the text and show why its' wrong. I just hope I can find someone who do a better job.

There is a good bibliography at the end of the article which appears to offer more meaty fair. If anybody reading this (if anybody is reading this) comes across a good article along these lines, please send them on.

New Perspective on Justification (N.T. Wright)

A whole passel of links to critical looks at Wright...
New Perspective on Justification (N.T. Wright)

Illusory Freedom

The Religion Report: 17 November 2004 - Anglican Bishop N.T Wright: Full Transcript :

Stephen Crittenden:A lot of the freedom we’ve won for ourselves may be an illusion.

Tom Wright: Yes, and that is the thing which Postmodernity names, that the freedom is simply turning over in your sleep within your prison cell and in fact you’re still pretty stuck. But I have always, in my scholarly work, taken very serious the Enlightenment's historical question, because it seems to me that before the Enlightenment, the church was getting away with murder, sometimes literally, alas, by simply saying “We’ll tell you how it is, we’ll tell you what the Bible means, here it is, boom-boom. No questions to be asked. And then along comes the Enlightenment and says “Wait a minute. We think that there's some history under there, and it might just disprove what you’re saying”. And I and a lot of people have taken that on board and said “Yes, OK, we will answer that, we will go to those historical sources and we’ll show that we can actually do this a lot better than you guys can”. And, I see this, because I know some people who are listening to this will have a further question, I see the model for that as Jesus’ dialogue with doubting Thomas. That Thomas comes and says “Here, I want some hard evidence , I want to be able touch and I want to be able to see”. And Jesus doesn’t say to him “Oh you silly boy, you know, you shouldn’t ask for touching and seeing, you know , go out of the room until you’re prepared to come back with a better question”.

Stephen Crittenden: He gives him touching and seeing.

Tom Wright: He says “be my guest. Bring your finger here and touch my hands”, and then when Thomas has done that and said “My Lord and my God”, Jesus says, “Actually it would have been better if you had done this without your silly questions”. So I want to take the Enlightenment on like Jesus took Thomas on. I think then the trouble with the Enlightenment’s rhetoric of freedom and human rights and so on, is it’s now over-reached itself. And part of the postmodern critique, which I endorse, is to say “Don’t believe all the rhetoric of the Enlightenment”. Because in fact there’s much more and a rather dark side to that. And people are using this language to crowbar particular agendas through and because we all signed up to the Enlightenment, we daren’t stand up against it. It’s happening in the European Union at the moment, but that’s another story which no doubt people in Australia are happily well off without."

Young Christians Rising - Hans Zeiger

Young Christians Rising - Hans Zeiger: "%u201CIn an age of relativism,%u201D writes Peter Kreeft, %u201Corthodoxy is the only possible rebellion left.%u201D Remarkably, Christian orthodoxy is spreading rapidly amongst young Americans; we can hope that a great awakening of the spiritual life of the nation is imminent.

Across denominations, young Americans seek commitment; they want to be presented with a challenge and a message that can occupy their innermost identity; they want to live with purpose and an excitement that undermines the prevalent boredom of the post-modern wasteland. That is why, in an August 2004 MTV survey, a mere 21 percent of 18 to 24 year olds said that religion plays a small or unimportant role in their life. Eighteen to 24 year olds were more than twice as likely to see Mel Gibson%u2019s %u201CPassion%u201D as they were to see Michael Moore%u2019s %u201CFahrenheit 9/11.%u201D"

Saturday, April 23, 2005

"Sampled" NT Wright

Those of you who enjoy NT Wright will particularly enjoy this song from Paul Seburn (originally posted on OpenSourceTheology.net):

While listening to the 4 talks at the Future of the People of God Conference, I've been a few times struck with the "cadence" of Tom's voice when he is expressing something he is passionate about. They happen to be things that I am also passionate about. As I have a home studio and am a songwriter / producer I've put together a couple mixes that include Tom's voice. At times his voice has a clear pulse to it and is almost melodic.


Google News

Friday, April 22, 2005

Kill the Commentators!

I have read very little, if any, of Soren Kierkegaard, but the provacative piece excerpted below has whet my appetite. I don't agree with his conclusions in the extreme, but I do bear witness to the sentiment....

Kill the Commentators!:
"The matter is quite simple. The Bible is very easy to understand. But we Christians are a bunch of scheming swindlers. We pretend to be unable to understand it because we know very well that the minute we understand we are obliged to act accordingly. Take any words in the New Testament and forget everything except pledging yourself to act accordingly. My God, you will say, if I do that my whole life will be ruined. How would I ever get on in the world?

Herein lies the real place of Christian scholarship. Christian scholarship is the Church's prodigious invention to defend it-self against the Bible, to ensure that we can continue to be good Christians without the Bible coming too close. Oh, priceless scholarship, what would we do without you? Dreadful it is to fall into the hands of the living God. Yes, it is even dreadful to be alone with the New Testament."

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Adopt a Village—Rick Warren's next Step

Here's a cool idea from Rick Warren, who's already demonstrated the ability to propogate an idea to millions of people....

Rick Warren, at 25-year point, launches global initiative - (BP): "P.E.A.C.E. is an acronym that stands for 'Plant churches, Equip servant leaders, Assist the poor, Care for the sick and Educate the next generation,' Warren said. The emphasis calls for church-based small groups to adopt villages where spiritual emptiness, selfish leadership, poverty, disease and ignorance keep people from experiencing the kind of life God wants them to have, he said.
"